La cosa en sí is
the second of the three volumes of Andrés Trapiello's multi-volume diary that, to
my surprise, I found in a bookstore in the city I was living in in France, a
city whose inhabitants, for the rest, have almost no interest in things
Spanish. If I didn't enjoy this volume quite as much as the first one I read, El jardín de la pólvora, it's just that the earlier volume
had already prepared me: I expected to be entertained and astonished. With the earlier volume, it had come as a complete surprise.
As with El
jardín, I particularly enjoyed Trapiello's bitchy, gossipy, and perhaps even
slightly malicious but surely accurate portrayals of his fellow Spanish
writers. He coincides with Enrique Vila-Matas at the famous book fair in
Guadalajara, Mexico, for example. Vila-Matas isn't named, but he's clearly
recognizable even to someone like me, who is by no means in the loop. Trapiello
describes him rather acidly (he calls him the man whose stock response, unlike
Bartleby's, would be: "I would prefer to") and stresses his physical
resemblance to Buster Keaton. I was most gratified, as I've never enjoyed
Vila-Matas's books, and his relative popularity baffles me. Vila-Matas's books,
for instance, have been translated into English; not so Trapiello's, which, on
the strength of the two I've now read, are more interesting and much funnier,
at least to me.
At another point,
in Colombia, Trapiello refers to the Colombian artist Botero as the current
darling (the diary corresponds to the year 2000) of the PUB (Pedorrez Universal
Burguesa). I laughed out loud there. Of course, that laughter may have been in
part the result of the single apéritif that I, in utter solitude, had just
consumed.
But good Lord
God, since we're obviously not going to translate him, contemporary
English-language writing needs someone with Trapiello's lucidity, his corrosive
humor and caustic spirit, his independence and courage! Instead we have J.
Franzen and P. Roth. We have Lorrie Moore and Louise Erdrich and Joyce Carol
Oates. We have critics who, as E. Abbey used to say, are like giant schools of
minnows, all turning in the same direction at once. We translate Enrique
Vila-Matas.
There are some
things in the diary I don't really like, too. For Trapiello, everything that's
attractive or appealing becomes precioso. I've never really liked that word in
either Spanish or English. All the writers he discusses are referred to either
as X or by their initials. I don't really get it. Sometimes you can identify
these writers easily enough (as with Mr. I Would Prefer To), but other times
it's hard. Here, Trapiello praises the stories of one D.J., a Colombian (?)
writer who works for the Banco de la República and lost a leg to a bomb. I
might have liked to try these stories for myself. But who is this writer?
Finally, Trapiello sometimes launches into brief flights of fancy (never more
than two or three pages) that sometimes strike me as a bit too fanciful. Are his
novels made up of successions of such passages? If so, I'm not sure I'd enjoy
them.
At all events, one
has one more volume of the diary to read, and after that one will decide where to
go: to one of the novels or back to one of the earlier volumes of the diary.